Saul Loeb, Pool via AP
Joe Biden has pulled out of the US election race and endorsed Kamala Harris as his potential successor.
In a post on X, he said: “Today I want to offer my full support and endorsement for Kamala to be the nominee of our party this year.
“Democrats — it’s time to come together and beat Trump.”
The Democrats now must navigate a shift that is unprecedented this late in an election year.
The party are set to hold their convention in Chicago on August 19-22. What was supposed to be a coronation for Mr Biden now becomes an open contest in which nearly 4,700 delegates will be responsible for picking a new standard-bearer to challenge Republican Donald Trump in the autumn.
The path ahead is neither easy nor obvious, even with Mr Biden endorsing Ms Harris. There are unanswered questions about logistics, money and political fallout.
Mr Biden won every state primary and caucus earlier this year and lost only the territory of American Samoa. At least 3,896 delegates had been pledged to support him.
Current party rules do not permit Mr Biden to pass them to another candidate. Politically, though, his endorsement is likely to be influential.
With Mr Biden stepping aside, Democrats technically start with an open convention. But realistically, his endorsement pushes Democrats into murky territory.
The immediate burden is on Ms Harris to solidify support across almost 4,000 delegates from the states, territories and District of Columbia, plus more than 700 so-called superdelegates that include party leaders, certain elected officials and former presidents and vice presidents.
Even before Mr Biden announced his decision, Democrats floated California governor Gavin Newsom and Michigan governor Gretchen Whitmer as potential contenders in addition to Ms Harris. Yet some Democrats argued publicly, and many privately, that it would be a no-brainer to elevate the first woman, first black woman and first person of south Asian descent to hold national office.
Given how important black voters – and black women especially – were to Mr Biden’s nomination and his choice of Ms Harris as running mate, it would be risky, to say the least, for Democrats to pass her over for a white nominee.
Democrats already faced historical headwinds before Mr Biden’s withdrawal. Mr Newsom and Ms Whitmer, both of whom are white, and any other Democrat would also have to weigh the short-term and long-term benefits of challenging Ms Harris now versus preserving goodwill for a future presidential primary.
Yet, fair or not, Ms Harris also has not been viewed as an especially beloved or empowered vice president. The best scenario for her and Democrats is to quickly shore up support and project a united front.
Democrats could even go forward with their plans for an early virtual vote – a move they’d planned to make sure Mr Biden was selected ahead of Ohio’s general election ballot deadline.
Biden’s campaign recently reported 91 million dollars (£70 million) cash on hand.
Allied Democratic campaign committees brought the total at his disposal to more than 240 million dollars (£186 million). Campaign finance experts agree generally that Ms Harris could control all those funds since the campaign was set up in her name as well as Mr Biden’s.
If Democrats do nominate someone other than Ms Harris, party accounts could still benefit the nominee, but the Biden-Harris account would have more restrictions. For example, legal experts say it could become an independent expenditure political action committee but not simply transfer its balance to a different nominee.
The vice presidential nomination is always a separate convention vote. In routine years, the convention ratifies the choice of the nominee. If Ms Harris closes ranks quickly, she could name her choice and have the delegates ratify it. In an extended fight, though, the vice presidency could become part of horse-trading — again, a return to conventions of an earlier era.
Any curveball during a US presidential campaign is certain to produce a flurry of state and federal lawsuits in this hyper-partisan era, and some conservatives have threatened just that.
State laws, though, typically do not prescribe how parties choose their nominees for president. And some Republican figures – Ohio governor Mike DeWine and Alabama governor Kay Ivey – have worked already this year to ensure their party did not deny Democrats’ routine ballot access.
Related: Starmer sees huge surge in approval rating after two weeks in the job
