Opinion

Ten years on from the expense scandal and nothing has changed

It was a little over ten years ago when one of the biggest political stories of the 21st century threatened to destabilise the establishment and bring Westminster to its knees.

A Freedom of Information Request sent in the wake of the financial crash when belts were tightened and the economy had been battered by unscrupulous bankers shook the British political system to its core.

Leaked, at times painfully, over a six week period by the Daily Telegraph at one point it felt like a day didn’t go by when a politician didn’t get exposed for funding his/ her floating duck island, roof repairs, garlic peeling sets or something equally ridiculous.

And it wasn’t just one or two comical claims that caused the real damage but the systematic nature that tarred just about every MP with the same brush.

It was the beginning of the moment the public turned their back on the political elite, one MP said at the time, and should have led to systematic change as a result.

The legacy of missed opportunity

But it didn’t.

As Even William Lewis, who as editor-in-chief of the Telegraph oversaw the story, wrote recently, “the chance to make radical reforms to our political institutions and how they operate was, however, glaringly (and deliberately) overlooked.

“The legacy of that missed opportunity is now clear to see.”

The Independent Parliamentary Standards Authority (IPSA), set up in response to the parliamentary expenses scandal, has handed MPs eight pay rises in the last ten years and only backtracked on its latest inflation-busting pay bump after a significant public backlash.

In 2010, an MP’s annual salary was £65,738. Today they earn £81,932.

That in itself is not a crime, but it does show that in a decade where most public sector pay has been severely restricted, our politicians look after themselves.

Old habits die hard

Most recently, they have also been exposed for looking after those close to them after the pandemic put pay to regular tender processes opening up government contracts to an unseen level of cronyism.

This week it emerged that a friend and former neighbour of Matt Hancock was able to supply tens of millions of vials for NHS Covid-19 tests – despite having no previous experience of making medical supplies.

Alex Bourne, who used to run a pub near to the health secretary’s former home in his Suffolk constituency, said he offered his services several months ago – by sending Hancock a personal WhatsApp message.

And he certainly wasn’t alone.

In October it was revealed a seven week-old firm with links to a Conservative peer landed a £122 million PPE contract despite having no obvious qualification beyond links to very substantial donors to, you guessed it, the Conservative Party.

A small, loss-making firm run by a Conservative councillor was also revealed to have been handed a £156 million contract to import PPE without any competition in the same month, a deal that one person said “reeks of cronyism”.

My Little Crony

Such is the proliferation of cronyism since the pandemic broke out an online map has been created showing the scores of government contracts handed to political donors, family members and employers.

‘My Little Crony’ uses reporting from the Byline Times, openDemocracy and other outlets to visually reveal what it calls the ‘scale of cronyism’ in Number 10.

It also illustrates quite wonderfully how, just ten years since the scandal that rocked parliament, nothing has changed for our MPs, who seemingly still believe they can get away with anything.

Related: Covid-19: Debunking the most common anti-vaxxer arguments

Jack Peat

Jack is a business and economics journalist and the founder of The London Economic (TLE). He has contributed articles to VICE, Huffington Post and Independent and is a published author. Jack read History at the University of Wales, Bangor and has a Masters in Journalism from the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.

Published by
Tags: Whatsapp