News

Could social media disinformation contribute to the downfall of democracies?

Social media disinformation could be contributing to the erosion of democracies across the world, the Infotagion podcast has warned.

The dawn of companies such as Facebook, YouTube and Twitter has let ‘Frankenstein’s monster’ loose, with algorithms that favour engagement over rational conversation creating a Wild West for authoritative regimes to capitalise on.

Calling for a fundamental shift in how content is ranked and promoted, Anne Applebaum, author of The Twilight of Democracy, said whole business models are being based on encouraging “anger, division and emotion – because that is what keeps people on the platforms.”

“Their goal is not to promote democracy or encourage rational conversation, these are advertising agencies. Their business model is designed to undermine rational debate.”

Liberal democracy

Applebaum cautioned that we have become complacent about liberal democracy in recent years, with the backlash against the electoral system in the US and political upheavals in Poland, Venezuela, Turkey and Hungary reminders that it shouldn’t be considered a given.

“Over history most democracies have failed,” she said. “It is circular.

“You have democracy, then you have autocracy, then you have a civil war, and that’s how politics has gone all the way back to the Athenian Republic.

“And the idea that we have somehow achieved something that is permanent has turned out to be wrong.”

Russia

The role of Russia in spreading disinformation has become a focal topic of discussion, particularly close to home after evidence emerged of meddling in the Brexit vote.

Chris Steele, author of the Trump Russia Dossier, said Vladmir Putin’s regime is developing a reputation for exposing insecurities.

He said: “I’m not saying there’s an ambilocal link between them, but the fact that the Brexit campaign were arguing that if we stayed in the EU we’d have up to 80 million Turks coming to Britain and the Russians were putting out memes along similar lines on social media at the time just shows you that they have managed to ride waves that are already there to magnify problems and divisions.”

Their reason for getting involved in such debates, says Applebaum, is two-fold.

“One is the break-up of the European Union, the other is to get the Americans to leave Europe and effectively end NATO.”

“The EU is a problem because when Russia negotiates with any European power by itself it’s much stronger, when it negotiates with the EU it’s much weaker.

“It is also a problem because of what it symbolises. It symbolises the triumph of global democracy, the possibility of integration, the possibility of peaceful, limitless trade, all things which would normally be appealing to Russians.”

Putin, as such, has been willing to support anybody who is anti-European, anti-American, Catalan separatism, Scottish separatism, and anything that could undermine the current system

Germany

One such election is the national vote taking place in Germany this month.

Interestingly, Russian interference has focussed on Green Party leader Annalena Baerbock who (not surprisingly) is against Russian gas exports and Nord Stream 2.

“She poses a threat to the Russian regime’s economic wellbeing”, Steele says, and has therefore become the subject of misinformation campaigns.

Only time will tell how successful they will be, but regardless of the outcome, social media will have had a hand to play.  

Listen to the Infotagion podcast here

Jack Peat

Jack is a business and economics journalist and the founder of The London Economic (TLE). He has contributed articles to VICE, Huffington Post and Independent and is a published author. Jack read History at the University of Wales, Bangor and has a Masters in Journalism from the University of Newcastle-upon-Tyne.

Published by
Tags: headline